Hello Heiner, > i2c_check_addr_busy(). Apart from requiring an unlocked version of > i2c_new_client_device(), this would include calls where separate arguments > are better. OK. If that is already on the horizon, then we can leave it. > We could include slave addresses in the address locking, but still > exclude 10bit addresses. Then the bitmap has only 16 bytes. That sounds feasible to me! Let's do it this way. Thanks, Wolfram
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
