Re: [PATCH v2] Do not mark ACPI devices as irq safe

Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Do not mark ACPI devices as irq safe
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2024 21:47:02 +0200
Cc: Breno Leitao <leitao@xxxxxxxxxx>, Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@xxxxxxxxxx>, Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@xxxxxxxxx>, Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@xxxxxxxxxx>, Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@xxxxxxxxx>, Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@xxxxxxxxxx>, leit@xxxxxxxx, Michael van der Westhuizen <rmikey@xxxxxxxx>, Andy Shevchenko <andy@xxxxxxxxxx>, "open list:I2C SUBSYSTEM HOST DRIVERS" <linux-i2c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "open list:TEGRA ARCHITECTURE SUPPORT" <linux-tegra@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, open list <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <CAHp75VcLR5ehrCyVsY0TKWSogRt-_ETqkZ1VE=ATVqRc8Y_9vg@mail.gmail.com>
Mail-followup-to: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx>, Breno Leitao <leitao@xxxxxxxxxx>, Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@xxxxxxxxxx>, Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@xxxxxxxxx>, Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@xxxxxxxxxx>, Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@xxxxxxxxx>, Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@xxxxxxxxxx>, leit@xxxxxxxx, Michael van der Westhuizen <rmikey@xxxxxxxx>, Andy Shevchenko <andy@xxxxxxxxxx>, "open list:I2C SUBSYSTEM HOST DRIVERS" <linux-i2c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "open list:TEGRA ARCHITECTURE SUPPORT" <linux-tegra@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, open list <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20240813161254.3509409-1-leitao@debian.org> <CAHp75VcLR5ehrCyVsY0TKWSogRt-_ETqkZ1VE=ATVqRc8Y_9vg@mail.gmail.com>

> end it will be ~5-6 lines only. Other than that, LGTM.

What about a proper prefix in the subject?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH v2] Do not mark ACPI devices as irq safe
  - From: Andy Shevchenko

References:
- [PATCH v2] Do not mark ACPI devices as irq safe
  - From: Breno Leitao
- Re: [PATCH v2] Do not mark ACPI devices as irq safe
  - From: Andy Shevchenko