Hi Fabio, On Wed, Aug 07, 2024 at 03:14:56PM GMT, Fabio Estevam wrote: > From: Fabio Estevam <festevam@xxxxxxx> > > Replace SET_RUNTIME_PM_OPS() with its modern RUNTIME_PM_OPS() > alternative. > > The combined usage of pm_ptr() and RUNTIME_PM_OPS() allows the > compiler to evaluate if the runtime suspend/resume() functions > are used at build time or are simply dead code. > > This allows removing the __maybe_unused notation from the runtime > suspend/resume() functions. > > Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam <festevam@xxxxxxx> pushed to i2c/i2c-host. Thanks, Andi
