Hi Andi, On Tue, Aug 6, 2024 at 1:27 AM Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi Adrian, > > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-i2c/8295cbe1-a7c5-4a35-a189-5d0bff51ede6@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ > > Suggested-by: Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Adrian Huang <ahuang12@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Reported-by: Dong Wang <wangdong28@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Tested-by: Dong Wang <wangdong28@xxxxxxxxxx> > > At first I thought that we need a Fixes tag, but on a second > thought I judged this more as a behavioural fix. Please, let me > konw if you think we want to have the Fixes tag here. Agree with your second thought, so no need to add the Fixes tag. > Meantime, I'm going to re-arrange the tag section. It's common to > sort the tags in a chronological order: > > Reported-by: (it first gets reported) > Suggested-by: (then someone suggested the fix) > Signed-off-by: (then someone implemented the fix) > Tested-by: (finally someone tested it) > Link: (as reference) > > I will also appreciate that the Reviewed-by and Tested-by and > Acked-by happen transparently and openly in the mailing list > rather behind the curtains. I'm sorry for the inconvenience. Wil pay more attention in the future. > Said that, thanks for your patch, I merged it into i2c/i2c-host. Thank you. -- Adrian
