Re: [PATCH v4 3/6] drm/i915: Make I2C terminology more inclusive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 7/22/2024 5:50 AM, Andi Shyti wrote:
> Hi Easwar,
> 
> merged to drm-intel-next. Thanks!
> 
> On Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at 05:27:31AM +0000, Easwar Hariharan wrote:
>> I2C v7, SMBus 3.2, and I3C 1.1.1 specifications have replaced "master/slave"
>> with more appropriate terms. Inspired by Wolfram's series to fix drivers/i2c/,
>> fix the terminology for users of I2C_ALGOBIT bitbanging interface, now that
>> the approved verbiage exists in the specification.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> I realized after pushing that this had the tag:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@xxxxxxxxx>
> Acked-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Not a big deal, but it's still a minor mistake.
> 
> Andi

Thank you for the merge, Andi! I'm missing what the mistake is, I added
the tags as I got them. Was I supposed to drop the R-B when Rodrigo gave
an A-B?

Thanks,
Easwar




[Index of Archives]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Hardward Monitoring]     [LM Sensors]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Media]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux