Re: [PATCH] i2c: Drop explicit initialization of struct i2c_device_id::driver_data to 0

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: Drop explicit initialization of struct i2c_device_id::driver_data to 0
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2024 23:11:28 +0200
Cc: Peter Rosin <peda@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-i2c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <i25xsy5nnefy2gkk4htkhcxd2ifgpn5ljhps4kd7ixn3tcy5to@gd7vrvgjvbj4>
Mail-followup-to: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Peter Rosin <peda@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-i2c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
References: <20240625083131.2205302-2-u.kleine-koenig@baylibre.com> <rb2fmtnhaqicg2behqfijfypfsvkqatud4h6klal77u6scw2gp@cznyn5vof4x4> <pja67neo74zw6rqpv5n7ekivlhejbmpuge6umtuatwhgjbmcwr@7u7f7vhpnwtt> <siwnljn7t22tsqybv6w3dndhuiynhvudtshkmyh67q6kyxjl6j@wuisjuqlovyg> <i25xsy5nnefy2gkk4htkhcxd2ifgpn5ljhps4kd7ixn3tcy5to@gd7vrvgjvbj4>

> Getting these all into alignment, maybe even picking a better name than
> "driver_data", would be the eventual goal. IMHO "driver_data" vs
> "data_ptr" looks strange, maybe I'd prefer "driver_ptr" over
> "data" and "data_ptr"?!

driver_data_ptr?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

References:
- [PATCH] i2c: Drop explicit initialization of struct i2c_device_id::driver_data to 0
  - From: Uwe Kleine-König
- Re: [PATCH] i2c: Drop explicit initialization of struct i2c_device_id::driver_data to 0
  - From: Wolfram Sang
- Re: [PATCH] i2c: Drop explicit initialization of struct i2c_device_id::driver_data to 0
  - From: Uwe Kleine-König
- Re: [PATCH] i2c: Drop explicit initialization of struct i2c_device_id::driver_data to 0
  - From: Wolfram Sang
- Re: [PATCH] i2c: Drop explicit initialization of struct i2c_device_id::driver_data to 0
  - From: Uwe Kleine-König

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] i2c: Drop explicit initialization of struct i2c_device_id::driver_data to 0
Next by Date: [PATCH v2 0/2] Add MPS MP5920 Host-Swap controller
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] i2c: Drop explicit initialization of struct i2c_device_id::driver_data to 0
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] i2c: Drop explicit initialization of struct i2c_device_id::driver_data to 0
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux GPIO] [Linux SPI] [Linux Hardward Monitoring] [LM Sensors] [Linux USB Devel] [Linux Media] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite News] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI]