Hi Andi, > I am not a big fan of the use of the word client. It's not used > anywhere in the documentation and it's too generic as a name for > giving it a specific meaning. > > I've seen already some confusion amongst reviewers and > maintainers when Easwar sent the patch in drm. > > If it depends on me, I would stick to the only controller/target > and render obsolet the use of the word "client" in the i2c > context. Have you read the paragraph "Synonyms" from patch 6? I don't think we can obsolete client because: $ git grep 'struct i2c_client \*client' | wc -l 6100 All the best, Wolfram
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
