On 4/23/2024 4:56 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 04:36:18PM -0700, Florian Fainelli kirjoitti:This patch series depends upon the following two patches being applied: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240422084109.3201-1-duanqiangwen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/ https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240422084109.3201-2-duanqiangwen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/ There is no reason why each driver should have to repeat the "i2c_designware" string all over the place, because when that happens we see the reverts like the above being necessary.Isn't that a part of ABI between drivers, i.e. whenever ones want to request_module() or so they need to know what they are doing, no?
Yes, the drivers should know, but as evidenced by the two patches above, there was still room for error. If we have to abide by a certain contract, which is platform_driver::driver::name, then we might as well have a header defining it no?
-- Florian
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
