Re: [PATCH] Revert "Revert "dt-bindings: i2c: qcom-cci: Document sc8280xp compatible""

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/04/2024 12:12, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
> On 11/04/2024 10:36, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 11/04/2024 10:52, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
>>> This reverts commit 3e383dce513f426b7d79c0e6f8afe5d22a581f58.
>>>
>>> The commit ae2a1f0f2cb5 ("dt-bindings: i2c: qcom-cci: Document sc8280xp compatible")
>>> was correct apparently, it is required to describe the sc8280xp-cci
>>> controller properly, as well it eliminates dtbs_check warnings.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir.zapolskiy@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> I am lost. Not on your patch, because it looks reasonable, but on entire
>> history.
>>
>> Can anyone explain me why original commit was reverted?
>>
>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/767bc246-a0a0-4dad-badc-81ed50573832@xxxxxxxxxx/
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Krzysztof
>>
> 
> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/devicetree-bindings/cover/20231006120159.3413789-1-bryan.odonoghue@xxxxxxxxxx/#3195094
> 
> We can you sm8250-cci instead, so dropped the additional compat.

I am sorry, but that links point to cover letter and actually the same
thread as I linked. What does it prove?

Best regards,
Krzysztof





[Index of Archives]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Hardward Monitoring]     [LM Sensors]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Media]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux