On Fri, 2024-04-05 at 11:09 +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Apr 04, 2024 at 04:33:51PM +0200, Niklas Schnelle wrote: > > In a future patch HAS_IOPORT=n will disable inb()/outb() and friends at > > compile time. We thus need to add HAS_IOPORT as dependency for those > > drivers using them. > > > > Co-developed-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Basically OK, but I am asking this question since last June because I > couldn't find that information in changelogs: > > In RFC v1, you agreed to drop PARPORT [1]. Is there a reason you haven't > done this so far? Only reasons seems to be that I'm bad at juggling large patch series. i2c-partport.c builds fine with HAS_IOPORT=n and I don't see a reason why it wouldn't work with MMIO based parallel port drivers. Will send a v2 shortly. Thanks, Niklas
