Re: i2c: designware: unhandled interrupt on N100 lpss channel 0

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 12:59:59PM +0100, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
> On 21.03.2024 12:20, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 10:26:06PM +0100, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
> >> On 20.03.2024 22:07, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 09:21:34PM +0100, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
> >>>> On 20.03.2024 16:59, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> >>>>> On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 03:56:29PM +0100, Heiner Kallweit wrote:

...

> >>>>>   grep 0000001b /sys/kernel/debug/pinctrl/*/pins
> >>>>
> >>>> pin 3 (GPPC_B_3) 3:INTC1057:00 GPIO 0x80100102 0x0000001b 0x00000000 [LOCKED tx]
> >>>> pin 82 (GPP_F_7_EMMC_CMD) 135:INTC1057:00 GPIO 0x44000300 0x0000001b 0x00000000 [LOCKED full, ACPI]
> >>>> pin 182 (GPPC_C_13) 269:INTC1057:00 GPIO 0x44000300 0x0000001b 0x00000000 [LOCKED full, ACPI]
> >>>
> >>> I was not correct, the value to grep is '0000[0-3][0-9a-f]1b' as there pull
> >>> up/down can be enabled.
> >>>
> >> Result is the same
> >>
> >>> Nevertheless from the above the pin 3 is one that is enabled as GPIO input with
> >>> RTE 27 and direct IRQ.  If it's a culprit, try to add in the pinctrl-intel.c at
> >>> the end of .probe:
> >>>
> >>> 	{
> >>> 		void __iomem *padcfg0;
> >>> 	        u32 value;
> >>>
> >>> 		padcfg0 = intel_get_padcfg(pctrl, 3, PADCFG0);
> >>>
> >>> 		value = readl(padcfg0);
> >>> 		value |= PADCFG0_GPIOTXDIS;
> >>> 		value |= PADCFG0_GPIORXDIS;
> >>> 		writel(value, padcfg0);
> >>> 	}
> >>>
> >>> If it helps, it will show the BIOS bug (likely).
> >>>
> >> Wow, this indeed fixes the issue for me. Thanks a lot!
> > 
> > Wow! Glad to hear this.
> > (Side note, can you test the patch against idma64 I sent yesterday?
> >  Tested-by tag will be appreciated!)
> > 
> Done, sent the Tested-by

Thank you!

> > We may try to have the quirk in the kernel, but it might be (quite) tricky
> > (see the link below).
> > 
> > Can you share `acpidump -o n100-tables.dat` (the file) somewhere?
> > I would like to see if this pin is anyhow being mentioned in the DSDT.
> > 
> Attached. Compressed file isn't that big, so hope it's ok to send it
> as an attachment.

Yes, got it.

Can you also share the output of

1) `dmesg` (when kernel command line has 'ignore_loglevel apic=debug');
2) `lspci -nk -vv`;
3) `grep -H 15 /sys/bus/acpi/devices/*/status`?

> >> For my understanding: Shall we (kernel driver) rely on the BIOS to configure
> >> GPIO's properly?
> > 
> > Yes, but there are bugs.
> > You may look, e.g., https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=214749.
> > 
> >> Or better assume that GPIO's are in an unknown state on
> >> driver load and configure them for our needs?
> > 
> > It depends. But usually (> 99% cases) we rely on the firmware.
> > 
> >> IOW: If we assume that other systems may have similar issues, should
> >> "some driver" use e.g. the pinctrl API to configure relevant pins?

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko






[Index of Archives]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Hardward Monitoring]     [LM Sensors]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Media]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux