Hello, On Fri Mar 8, 2024 at 1:27 PM CET, Andi Shyti wrote: > Hi Theo, > > On Fri, Mar 08, 2024 at 09:57:39AM +0100, Théo Lebrun wrote: > > Hello, > > > > On Fri Mar 8, 2024 at 12:01 AM CET, Andi Shyti wrote: > > > Hi Theo, > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 06, 2024 at 06:59:23PM +0100, Théo Lebrun wrote: > > > > IRQ_MASK and I2C_CLEAR_ALL_INTS both mask available interrupts. IRQ_MASK > > > > removes top options (bits 29-31). I2C_CLEAR_ALL_INTS removes reserved > > > > options including top bits. Keep the latter. > > > > > > > > 31 29 27 25 23 21 19 17 15 13 11 09 07 05 03 01 > > > > 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 08 06 04 02 00 > > > > --- IRQ_MASK: -------------------------------------------------- > > > > 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 > > > > 0 0 0 > > > > --- I2C_CLEAR_ALL_INTS: ---------------------------------------- > > > > 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 > > > > 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 > > > > > > > > Notice I2C_CLEAR_ALL_INTS is more restrictive than IRQ_MASK. > > > > > > > > Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Signed-off-by: Théo Lebrun <theo.lebrun@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > You did answer my question in v2, thanks, Theo! > > > > Oops my mailer syntax is telling me that the lines starting with '---' > > might cause issue as it might mark the end of commit messages. I'll fix > > that in next revision. If it gets applied before that it should be > > checked that part of the message doesn't get lost. > > mmhhh... right! No need to resend, if nothing else is needed from > the series, please paste the commit message here and I will fix > it. The message would become the following (tab-indented). Both '---' turned into '--' in the bit table. I confirmed `git am` does not truncate this updated message. i2c: nomadik: simplify IRQ masking logic IRQ_MASK and I2C_CLEAR_ALL_INTS both mask available interrupts. IRQ_MASK removes top options (bits 29-31). I2C_CLEAR_ALL_INTS removes reserved options including top bits. Keep the latter. 31 29 27 25 23 21 19 17 15 13 11 09 07 05 03 01 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 08 06 04 02 00 -- IRQ_MASK: --------------------------------------------------- 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 -- I2C_CLEAR_ALL_INTS: ----------------------------------------- 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Notice I2C_CLEAR_ALL_INTS is more restrictive than IRQ_MASK. Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Théo Lebrun <theo.lebrun@xxxxxxxxxxx> Thanks for the quick follow-up! -- Théo Lebrun, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com
