On 27.01.2024 16:18, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
> Class-based I2C probing requires detect() and address_list to be
> set in the I2C client driver, see checks in i2c_detect().
> It's misleading to declare I2C_CLASS_HWMON support if this
> precondition isn't met.
>
Any feedback here? Should this better go through the I2C tree?
> Signed-off-by: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/input/misc/bma150.c | 1 -
> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/input/misc/bma150.c b/drivers/input/misc/bma150.c
> index 0fb4cc628..22feaa8c1 100644
> --- a/drivers/input/misc/bma150.c
> +++ b/drivers/input/misc/bma150.c
> @@ -549,7 +549,6 @@ static struct i2c_driver bma150_driver = {
> .name = BMA150_DRIVER,
> .pm = &bma150_pm,
> },
> - .class = I2C_CLASS_HWMON,
> .id_table = bma150_id,
> .probe = bma150_probe,
> .remove = bma150_remove,
