On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 3:38 PM Théo Lebrun <theo.lebrun@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Somewhat related to this patch: while writing it, I noticed the total > timeout of flush_i2c_fifo() is 10 times the timeout. Without this > series, this means 10*200ms of busywaiting! > > If you have an opinion on a more sensible option for this I could add a > patch to my V2. I don't know enough to pick a sensible value. > > I'm unsure if it makes sense that the timeout of flush_i2c_fifo() is a > multiple of the transfer timeout. Does it make sense that those two > timeouts are correlated? I have a *vague* memory of the timeouts for flushing needing to be longer but I might be mistaken. This is probably a Srinidhi or even Sachin question... Sadly I don't have their current mail addresses. Yours, Linus Walleij
