On Fri, 17 Nov 2023 at 16:05, Wolfram Sang <wsa@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Jan Bottorff (1):
> i2c: designware: Fix corrupted memory seen in the ISR
I have pulled this, but honestly, looking at the patch, I really get
the feeling that there's some deeper problem going on.
Either the designware driver doesn't do the right locking, or the
relaxed IO accesses improperly are escaping the locks that do exist.
Either way, just changing "writel_relaxed()" to "writel()" seems to be wrong.
Of course, it is entirely possible that those accesses should never
have been relaxed in the first place, and that the actual access
ordering between two accesses in the same thread matters. For example,
the code did
*val = readw_relaxed(dev->base + reg) |
(readw_relaxed(dev->base + reg + 2) << 16);
and if the order of those two readw's mattered, then the "relaxed" was
always entirely wrong.
But the commit message seems to very much imply a multi-thread issue,
and for *that* issue, doing "writel_relaxed" -> "writel" is very much
wrong. The only thing fixing threading issues is proper locks (or
_working_ locks).
Removing the "relaxed" may *hide* the issue, but doesn't really fix it.
For the arm64 people I brought in: this is now commit f726eaa787e9
("i2c: designware: Fix corrupted memory seen in the ISR") upstream.
I've done the pull, because even if this is purely a "hide the
problem" fix, it's better than what the code did. I'm just asking that
people look at this a bit more.
Linus
