Hi Chris,
...
> +static int
> +mv64xxx_i2c_recover_bus(struct i2c_adapter *adap)
> +{
> + struct mv64xxx_i2c_data *drv_data = i2c_get_adapdata(adap);
> + int ret;
> + u32 val;
> +
> + dev_dbg(&adap->dev, "Trying i2c bus recovery\n");
> + writel(MV64XXX_I2C_UNSTUCK_TRIGGER, drv_data->unstuck_reg);
> + ret = readl_poll_timeout_atomic(drv_data->unstuck_reg, val,
> + !(val & MV64XXX_I2C_UNSTUCK_INPROGRESS),
> + 10, 1000);
mmmhhh... still a bit skeptical about waiting 100 times 10us in
atomic.
I'm still of the opinion that this should run in a separate
thread. Any different opinion from the network?
BTW, first question, considering that you decreased the time
considerably... does it work?
Andi
