2023-09-21 at 10:57, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> Advertise our coding style by following it :)
>
> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
A no-brainer...
Acked-by: Peter Rosin <peda@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cheers,
Peter
> ---
> drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-gpio.c | 7 +++----
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-gpio.c b/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-gpio.c
> index 5ca03bd34c8d..0419c7453281 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-gpio.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-gpio.c
> @@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ struct gpiomux {
> struct gpio_desc **gpios;
> };
>
> -static void i2c_mux_gpio_set(const struct gpiomux *mux, unsigned val)
> +static void i2c_mux_gpio_set(const struct gpiomux *mux, unsigned int val)
> {
> DECLARE_BITMAP(values, BITS_PER_TYPE(val));
>
> @@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ static int i2c_mux_gpio_probe_fw(struct gpiomux *mux,
> struct device_node *adapter_np;
> struct i2c_adapter *adapter = NULL;
> struct fwnode_handle *child;
> - unsigned *values;
> + unsigned int *values;
> int rc, i = 0;
>
> if (is_of_node(fwnode)) {
> @@ -102,7 +102,6 @@ static int i2c_mux_gpio_probe_fw(struct gpiomux *mux,
> device_for_each_child_node(dev, child) {
> if (is_of_node(child)) {
> fwnode_property_read_u32(child, "reg", values + i);
> -
> } else if (is_acpi_node(child)) {
> rc = acpi_get_local_address(ACPI_HANDLE_FWNODE(child), values + i);
> if (rc) {
> @@ -127,7 +126,7 @@ static int i2c_mux_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> struct gpiomux *mux;
> struct i2c_adapter *parent;
> struct i2c_adapter *root;
> - unsigned initial_state;
> + unsigned int initial_state;
> int i, ngpios, ret;
>
> mux = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*mux), GFP_KERNEL);
