> 1. I checked the MAINTAINERS section related to ARM/VT8500, > Found that the entire ARM/VT8500 ARCHITECTURE is currently > unmaintained, maybe one day it will be removed from the kernel. > So I think it might be better as a separate module. But even if we remove the arch, we will not remove the viai2c core, right? We just remove the Makefile entry for WMT. And your driver will still link two object files into one kernel object. > 2. In addition, if not separated from wmt, the driver would > become a bit confusing and difficult to maintain. Ah, maybe this is the misunderstanding. The seperation from WMT is very good! It is just that the new viai2c core shouldn't be a module itself but only a seperate object file which gets linked into your driver. Please check the octeon or pasemi driver for an example.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
