On 2023/8/16 18:22, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 05:46:18PM +0800, Ruan Jinjie wrote:
>> Use IS_ERR_OR_NULL() instead of open-coding it
>> to simplify the code.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ruan Jinjie <ruanjinjie@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-at91-master.c | 2 +-
>> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx.c | 2 +-
>> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-at91-master.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-at91-master.c
>> index 94cff1cd527e..0e454c04a145 100644
>> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-at91-master.c
>> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-at91-master.c
>> @@ -831,7 +831,7 @@ static int at91_init_twi_recovery_gpio(struct platform_device *pdev,
>> struct i2c_bus_recovery_info *rinfo = &dev->rinfo;
>>
>> rinfo->pinctrl = devm_pinctrl_get(&pdev->dev);
>> - if (!rinfo->pinctrl || IS_ERR(rinfo->pinctrl)) {
>> + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(rinfo->pinctrl)) {
>> dev_info(dev->dev, "can't get pinctrl, bus recovery not supported\n");
>> return PTR_ERR(rinfo->pinctrl);
>> }
>> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx.c
>> index 10e89586ca72..8807c90df749 100644
>> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx.c
>> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx.c
>> @@ -1388,7 +1388,7 @@ static int i2c_imx_init_recovery_info(struct imx_i2c_struct *i2c_imx,
>> struct i2c_bus_recovery_info *rinfo = &i2c_imx->rinfo;
>>
>> i2c_imx->pinctrl = devm_pinctrl_get(&pdev->dev);
>> - if (!i2c_imx->pinctrl || IS_ERR(i2c_imx->pinctrl)) {
>> + if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(i2c_imx->pinctrl)) {
>> dev_info(&pdev->dev, "can't get pinctrl, bus recovery not supported\n");
>> return PTR_ERR(i2c_imx->pinctrl);
>> }
>
> As stated in my previous reply to a similar patch, devm_pinctrl_get()
> can not return NULL, so it makes more sense to remove the test for NULL
> rather than "cleaning up" the buggy code, but leaving the bugs behind.
Right! I'll fix it sooner. Thank you very much.
>
