On Tue, Aug 08, 2023 at 09:29:50AM +0800, Liao Chang wrote: > Use the dev_err_probe function instead of dev_err in the probe function > so that the printed messge includes the return value and also handles > -EPROBE_DEFER nicely. > > Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@xxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Liao Chang <liaochang1@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qcom-cci.c | 6 ++---- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qcom-cci.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qcom-cci.c > index 622dc14add9d..cf13abec05f1 100644 > --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qcom-cci.c > +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qcom-cci.c > @@ -588,10 +588,8 @@ static int cci_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > /* Clocks */ > > ret = devm_clk_bulk_get_all(dev, &cci->clocks); > - if (ret < 1) { > - dev_err(dev, "failed to get clocks %d\n", ret); > - return ret; > - } > + if (ret < 1) > + return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "failed to get clocks\n"); devm_clk_bulk_get_all() will already have printed a more useful/specific error message. Unfortunately will not be carried as the deferred probe reason, but this error will just indicate that some clock controller wasn't ready... TL;DR I think we should just drop the error print from here instead. Regards, Bjorn