Hi Andy Shevchenko,
Thanks for the feedback.
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] i2c: Add i2c_device_get_match_data()
> callback
>
> On Tue, Aug 01, 2023 at 06:03:18PM +0100, Biju Das wrote:
> > Add i2c_device_get_match_data() callback to struct bus_type().
> >
> > While at it, introduced i2c_get_match_data_helper() to avoid code
> > duplication with i2c_get_match_data().
>
> Have you used --patience when prepared the patch for sending?
Normally, I use "git format-patch -n --subject-prefix="PATCH vY" --cover-letter" for preparing patch.
I see there is a difference with "git format-patch -n --patience *".
I will send this patch series with --patience option.
>
> ...
>
> > -const void *i2c_get_match_data(const struct i2c_client *client)
> > +static const void *i2c_get_match_data_helper(const struct i2c_driver
> *driver,
> > + const struct i2c_client *client)
> > {
>
> > - struct i2c_driver *driver = to_i2c_driver(client->dev.driver);
>
> Does it make sense to remove and add an additional parameter? In one
> case it's a copy, in another it probably the same, just hidden in the
> code.
Ok, you mean add the below check in i2c_device_get_match_data() and
drop *driver parameter from i2c_get_match_data_helper().
if (!client || !dev->driver)
return NULL;
>
> > const struct i2c_device_id *match;
> > +
> > + match = i2c_match_id(driver->id_table, client);
> > + if (!match)
> > + return NULL;
> > +
> > + return (const void *)match->driver_data; }
> > +
> > +static const void *i2c_device_get_match_data(const struct device
> > +*dev) {
> > + /* TODO: use i2c_verify_client() when it accepts const pointer */
> > + const struct i2c_client *client = (dev->type ==
> &i2c_client_type) ?
> > + to_i2c_client(dev) : NULL;
> > const void *data;
>
> > + if (!dev->driver)
> > + return NULL;
>
> When can this be true?
>
> > + data = i2c_get_match_data_helper(to_i2c_driver(dev->driver),
> client);
> > + if (data)
> > + return data;
> >
> > - data = (const void *)match->driver_data;
> > + if (dev->driver->of_match_table) {
> > + const struct of_device_id *match;
> > +
> > + match = i2c_of_match_device_sysfs(dev->driver-
> >of_match_table,
> > + (struct i2c_client *)client);
> > + if (match)
> > + data = match->data;
> > }
> >
> > return data;
> > }
>
> ...
>
> > -static const struct of_device_id*
> > +const struct of_device_id*
>
> While here, add a missing space after of_device_id.
OK.
>
> ...
>
> > +const struct of_device_id*
>
> Ditto.
>
> Or use below (weird) style in case it occurs more often than usual one.
It is one of case. So, I will use space after of_device_id.
>
> > +i2c_of_match_device_sysfs(const struct of_device_id *matches,
> > + struct i2c_client *client);
> > +
> > const struct of_device_id
> > *i2c_of_match_device(const struct of_device_id *matches,
> > struct i2c_client *client);
>
> ...
>
> > +static inline const struct of_device_id *i2c_of_match_device(const
> > +struct of_device_id *matches,
>
> As per above.
OK, This will be moved to i2c-core.h.
Cheers,
Biju
>
> > + struct i2c_client *client)
> > +{
> > + return NULL;
> > +}
>
> --
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko
>
