On Mon, Jul 3, 2023 at 2:14 PM Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Compiler is not happy about a couple of symbols that, it thinks, > are not declared: > > warning: symbol 'acpi_device_lock' was not declared. Should it be static? > warning: symbol 'acpi_wakeup_device_list' was not declared. Should it be static? > > Include "sleep.h" to have them explicitly declared and make > the compiler happy. > > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> I've just applied a patch from Ben Dooks making the exact same change. > --- > drivers/acpi/scan.c | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/scan.c b/drivers/acpi/scan.c > index ec1c9bec8bae..5b145f1aaa1b 100644 > --- a/drivers/acpi/scan.c > +++ b/drivers/acpi/scan.c > @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ > #include <linux/dma-direct.h> > > #include "internal.h" > +#include "sleep.h" > > #define ACPI_BUS_CLASS "system_bus" > #define ACPI_BUS_HID "LNXSYBUS" > --
