On Monday, June 5, 2023 3:53 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > Do you mean the device tree binding? This property in only used in case of software > > node, for wangxun Soc, which has no device tree structure. > > I see, thanks. > > How is the dependency of these patches? I'd like to take this patch via > the i2c tree if possible. I guess the other patches will build even if > this patch is not in the net-tree? Or do we need an immutable branch? Or > is it really better if all goes in via net? We might get merge conflicts > then, though. There are other designware patches pending. Yes, other patches will build even without this patch. But SFP will not work. This patch series implement I2C, GPIO, SFP and PHYLINK. The support of SFP is dependent on I2C and GPIO. If these patches will be end up merging in the same upstream version, it's not a problem to merge them in different trees, I think.
