On Sun, 14 May 2023 12:36:33 +0200, Marius Hoch wrote: > The Dell Latitude E7450 uses IRQ 18 for the accelerometer, > but also claims that the SMBus uses IRQ 18. This will > result in: > > i801_smbus 0000:00:1f.3: PCI INT C: failed to register GSI > i801_smbus 0000:00:1f.3: Failed to enable SMBus PCI device (-16) > i801_smbus: probe of 0000:00:1f.3 failed with error -16 > > Force the SMBus IRQ to IRQ_NOTCONNECTED in this case, so that > we fall back to polling, which also seems to be what the (very > dated) Windows 7 drivers on the Dell Latitude E7450 do. > > This was tested on Dell Latitude E7450. > > Signed-off-by: Marius Hoch <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-i801.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-i801.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-i801.c > index ac5326747c51..5fd2ac585160 100644 > --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-i801.c > +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-i801.c > @@ -1624,6 +1624,20 @@ static void i801_setup_hstcfg(struct i801_priv *priv) > pci_write_config_byte(priv->pci_dev, SMBHSTCFG, hstcfg); > } > > +/** As reported by the kernel test robot, please don't start a comment with /** unless it's a kernel-doc-style comment. > + * These DELL devices claim an IRQ for the SMBus (usually 18), but we can't use > + * it, as its actually for the I2C accelerometer. > + */ > +static const struct dmi_system_id dmi_force_no_irq[] = { > + { > + .matches = { > + DMI_MATCH(DMI_SYS_VENDOR, "Dell Inc."), > + DMI_MATCH(DMI_PRODUCT_NAME, "Latitude E7450"), > + }, > + }, > + {} /* Terminating entry */ > +}; > + > static int i801_probe(struct pci_dev *dev, const struct pci_device_id *id) > { > int err, i; > @@ -1657,6 +1671,12 @@ static int i801_probe(struct pci_dev *dev, const struct pci_device_id *id) > if (!(priv->features & FEATURE_BLOCK_BUFFER)) > priv->features &= ~FEATURE_BLOCK_PROC; > > + if (dmi_check_system(dmi_force_no_irq)) { If the problem is caused by dev->irq being 255, and now that we know that this value is special on x86, wouldn't it make more sense to restrict this quirk to CONFIG_X86 and simply check for dev->irq == 0xff? This would save us the extra effort of maintaining a list of machines which need the quirk. > + /* Force no IRQ for these devices, otherwise pcim_enable_device will fail */ > + dev->irq = IRQ_NOTCONNECTED; > + dev->irq_managed = 1; This field is undocumented so I have no idea what it does. Is it not sufficient to set irq to IRQ_NOTCONNECTED? > + } > + > err = pcim_enable_device(dev); > if (err) { > dev_err(&dev->dev, "Failed to enable SMBus PCI device (%d)\n", -- Jean Delvare SUSE L3 Support