Hello, On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 11:32:04AM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > On Fri, Nov 18, 2022 at 02:57:47PM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 18, 2022 at 11:45:30PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > > > From: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > The probe function doesn't make use of the i2c_device_id * parameter so it > > > can be trivially converted. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > This patch hasn't made it into next yet. Is it still on your radar? > > My plans for this series is to complete the conversion after the next > merge window which should include most patches from this series. > > So I ask you to either take this patch during the next merge window or > accept that it will be applied together with the i2c core conversion > that drops .probe() with the i2c_device_id parameter. This got Guenter's R-b tag twice now, but the patch didn't appear yet in next. I'll prepare a series for Wolfram to apply via his i2c tree based on what is in next during the merge window with the idea to get the change early into next with an immutable tag. If you get this patch in during the merge window that would be ideal, but if not, I will take care of it and as announced will send it together with the i2c change. Best regards Uwe -- Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König | Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
