Hi Tomi, On Wed, Dec 14, 2022 at 08:36:47AM +0200, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > On 14/12/2022 08:29, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > > >> wondering if the struct device of the DS90UB913 could be passed instead > >> of the port, to avoid passing the port throught > >> ds90ub9xx_platform_data. > > > > Interesting thought. That would limit the number of remote i2c busses to > > one, though. Not a problem for FPD-Link, but I wonder if that's assuming > > too much for the future users. Then again, this is an in-kernel API so > > we could extend it later if needed. So I'll try this out and see if I > > hit any issues. > > Right, so the issue with this one would be that it would prevent a > single device uses. E.g. a single chip which acts as an ATR (similar to > i2c-mux chips), i.e. it contains both the main and the remote i2c busses. I don't think I understand this, sorry. -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart
