On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 09:23:53PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 07:43:06PM +0200, Hawa, Hanna wrote: ... > return DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL((u64)ic_clk * tSYMBOL, MICRO) - > 8 + offset; > > return DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL((u64)ic_clk * (tSYMBOL + tf), MICRO) - > 3 + offset; > > return DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL((u64)ic_clk * (tLOW + tf), MICRO) - > 1 + offset; Thinking more on this, I would probably replace the order of arguments to make it ' + offset - N' in each case. Since plus will be on the previous line and become first it will be easier to parse the arithmetical expression. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
