On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 05:17:13PM +0000, Hanna Hawa wrote: > From: Lareine Khawaly <lareine@xxxxxxxxxx> Thank you for an update, my comments below. > In functions i2c_dw_scl_lcnt() and i2c_dw_scl_hcnt() may have overflow > by depending on the values of the given parameters including the ic_clk. > For example in our use case where ic_clk is larger than one million, > multiplication of ic_clk * 4700 will result in 32 bit overflow. > > Add cast of u64 to the calculation to avoid multiplication overflow, and > use the corresponding define for divide. > > Fixes: 2373f6b9744d ("i2c-designware: split of i2c-designware.c into core and bus specific parts") It's not clear if the second patch you sent (about unsigned long --> u32) is required or not, can you clarify this in the changelog? > Signed-off-by: Lareine Khawaly <lareine@xxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Hanna Hawa <hhhawa@xxxxxxxxxx> This should be last part of the message body. The cutter '---' line makes it so, currently you finish your message with a changelog and not tags. So, you need to move the changelog after the cutter line. > Change Log v2->v3: > - Avoid changing the ic_clk parameter to u64, and do casting in the > calculation itself instead. > - use DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL instead of DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST > > Change Log v1->v2: > - Update commit message and add fix tag. > --- > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-common.c | 9 ++++++--- > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-common.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-common.c > index e0a46dfd1c15..9cc02d0142df 100644 > --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-common.c > +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-common.c > @@ -351,7 +351,8 @@ u32 i2c_dw_scl_hcnt(u32 ic_clk, u32 tSYMBOL, u32 tf, int cond, int offset) > * > * If your hardware is free from tHD;STA issue, try this one. > */ > - return DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(ic_clk * tSYMBOL, MICRO) - 8 + offset; > + return DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL((u64)ic_clk * tSYMBOL, > + MICRO) - 8 + offset; There is still a room for 'MICRO) -' part on the previous line. Ditto for the similar cases. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko