On Fri, 18 Nov 2022 23:37:23 +0100
Uwe Kleine-König <uwe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> From: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> .probe_new() doesn't get the i2c_device_id * parameter, so determine
> that explicitly in the probe function.
>
> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_i2c.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_i2c.c b/drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_i2c.c
> index 7a8d60a5afa9..70eaa408e388 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_i2c.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_i2c.c
> @@ -95,9 +95,9 @@ static int inv_mpu_i2c_aux_setup(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
> *
Kernel-doc (no idea why it needs it for a probe function) has
id documented. I've fixed up dropping that.
Jonathan
> * Returns 0 on success, a negative error code otherwise.
> */
> -static int inv_mpu_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
> - const struct i2c_device_id *id)
> +static int inv_mpu_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
> {
> + const struct i2c_device_id *id = i2c_client_get_device_id(client);
> const void *match;
> struct inv_mpu6050_state *st;
> int result;
> @@ -260,7 +260,7 @@ static const struct acpi_device_id inv_acpi_match[] = {
> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, inv_acpi_match);
>
> static struct i2c_driver inv_mpu_driver = {
> - .probe = inv_mpu_probe,
> + .probe_new = inv_mpu_probe,
> .remove = inv_mpu_remove,
> .id_table = inv_mpu_id,
> .driver = {
