Re: [PATCH] i2c: i801: Prefer async probe

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: i801: Prefer async probe
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2022 22:59:03 +0200
Cc: Mani Milani <mani@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, LKML <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-i2c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@xxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20220929174334.44d3e6d9@endymion.delvare>
Mail-followup-to: Wolfram Sang <wsa@xxxxxxxxxx>, Jean Delvare <jdelvare@xxxxxxx>, Mani Milani <mani@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, LKML <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-i2c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@xxxxxxxxx>
References: <20220826074430.1333272-1-mani@chromium.org> <20220929174334.44d3e6d9@endymion.delvare>

> Jarkko, Heiner, Wolfram, can you think of any reason why we should NOT
> apply this change?

Nope. Even if we overlooked something, we can still revert and figure
out what went wrong.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] i2c: i801: Prefer async probe
  - From: Mani Milani

References:
- [PATCH] i2c: i801: Prefer async probe
  - From: Mani Milani
- Re: [PATCH] i2c: i801: Prefer async probe
  - From: Jean Delvare

Prev by Date: Re: i2c-dev mismatch with proprietary nvidia driver
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: i2c: st,stm32-i2c: Document interrupt-names property
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] i2c: i801: Prefer async probe
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] i2c: i801: Prefer async probe
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux GPIO] [Linux SPI] [Linux Hardward Monitoring] [LM Sensors] [Linux USB Devel] [Linux Media] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite News] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI]

Powered by Linux