On 9/20/22 7:05 PM, Sean Anderson wrote: > > > On 9/20/22 6:49 PM, Leo Li wrote: >> >> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@xxxxxxxx> >>> Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2022 11:21 AM >>> To: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@xxxxxxx>; Oleksij Rempel >>> <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Pengutronix Kernel Team >>> <kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; linux-i2c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-arm-kernel >>> <linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Vinod Koul <vkoul@xxxxxxxxxx>; >>> dmaengine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Leo Li <leoyang.li@xxxxxxx>; Laurentiu Tudor >>> <laurentiu.tudor@xxxxxxx> >>> Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; dri- >>> devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Christian König <christian.koenig@xxxxxxx>; >>> linaro-mm-sig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Shawn Guo <shawnguo@xxxxxxxxxx>; Sumit >>> Semwal <sumit.semwal@xxxxxxxxxx>; Joy Zou <joy.zou@xxxxxxx>; linux- >>> media@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> Subject: Re: [BUG] ls1046a: eDMA does not transfer data from I2C >>> >>> >>> >>> On 9/20/22 11:44 AM, Sean Anderson wrote: >>> > >>> > >>> > On 9/20/22 11:24 AM, Sean Anderson wrote: >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> On 9/20/22 6:07 AM, Robin Murphy wrote: >>> >>> On 2022-09-19 23:24, Sean Anderson wrote: >>> >>>> Hi all, >>> >>>> >>> >>>> I discovered a bug in either imx_i2c or fsl-edma on the LS1046A >>> >>>> where no data is read in i2c_imx_dma_read except for the last two >>> >>>> bytes (which are not read using DMA). This is perhaps best >>> >>>> illustrated with the following example: >>> >>>> >>> >>>> # hexdump -C /sys/bus/nvmem/devices/0-00540/nvmem >>> >>>> [ 308.914884] i2c i2c-0: ffff000809380000 0x0000000889380000 >>> 0x00000000f5401000 ffff000075401000 >>> >>>> [ 308.923529] src= 2180004 dst=f5401000 attr= 0 soff= 0 nbytes=1 >>> slast= 0 >>> >>>> [ 308.923529] citer= 7e biter= 7e doff= 1 dlast_sga= 0 >>> >>>> [ 308.923529] major_int=1 disable_req=1 enable_sg=0 [ 308.942113] >>> >>>> fsl-edma 2c00000.edma: vchan 000000001b4371fc: txd >>> >>>> 00000000d9dd26c5[4]: submitted [ 308.974049] fsl-edma >>> >>>> 2c00000.edma: txd 00000000d9dd26c5[4]: marked complete [ >>> >>>> 308.981339] i2c i2c-0: ffff000809380000 = [2e 2e 2f 2e 2e 2f 2e 2e >>> >>>> 2f 64 65 76 69 63 65 73 2f 70 6c 61 74 66 6f 72 6d 2f 73 6f 63 2f 32 31 38 30 >>> 30 30 30 2e 69 32 63 2f 69 32 63 2d 30 2f 30 2d 30 30 35 34 2f 30 2d 30 30 35 34 >>> 30 00 00] [ 309.002226] i2c i2c-0: ffff000075401000 = [2e 2e 2f 2e 2e 2f 2e 2e 2f >>> 64 65 76 69 63 65 73 2f 70 6c 61 74 66 6f 72 6d 2f 73 6f 63 2f 32 31 38 30 30 30 30 >>> 2e 69 32 63 2f 69 32 63 2d 30 2f 30 2d 30 30 35 34 2f 30 2d 30 30 35 34 30 00 00] >>> [ 309.024649] i2c i2c-0: ffff000809380080 0x0000000889380080 >>> 0x00000000f5401800 ffff000075401800 >>> >>>> [ 309.033270] src= 2180004 dst=f5401800 attr= 0 soff= 0 nbytes=1 >>> slast= 0 >>> >>>> [ 309.033270] citer= 7e biter= 7e doff= 1 dlast_sga= 0 >>> >>>> [ 309.033270] major_int=1 disable_req=1 enable_sg=0 [ 309.051633] >>> >>>> fsl-edma 2c00000.edma: vchan 000000001b4371fc: txd >>> >>>> 00000000d9dd26c5[5]: submitted [ 309.083526] fsl-edma >>> >>>> 2c00000.edma: txd 00000000d9dd26c5[5]: marked complete [ >>> >>>> 309.090807] i2c i2c-0: ffff000809380080 = [00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 >>> >>>> 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 >>> >>>> 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 >>> >>>> 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00] [ 309.111694] i2c i2c-0: >>> >>>> ffff000075401800 = [00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 >>> >>>> 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 >>> >>>> 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 >>> >>>> 00 00 00 00] >>> >>>> 00000000 2e 2e 2f 2e 2e 2f 2e 2e 2f 64 65 76 69 63 65 73 >>> >>>> |../../../devices| >>> >>>> 00000010 2f 70 6c 61 74 66 6f 72 6d 2f 73 6f 63 2f 32 31 >>> >>>> |/platform/soc/21| >>> >>>> 00000020 38 30 30 30 30 2e 69 32 63 2f 69 32 63 2d 30 2f >>> >>>> |80000.i2c/i2c-0/| >>> >>>> 00000030 30 2d 30 30 35 34 2f 30 2d 30 30 35 34 30 00 00 >>> >>>> |0-0054/0-00540..| >>> >>>> 00000040 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 >>> >>>> |................| >>> >>>> * >>> >>>> 00000070 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ff ff >>> >>>> |................| >>> >>>> 00000080 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 >>> >>>> |................| >>> >>>> * >>> >>>> 000000f0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ff 5b >>> >>>> |...............[| >>> >>>> 00000100 >>> >>>> >>> >>>> (patch with my debug prints appended below) >>> >>>> >>> >>>> Despite the DMA completing successfully, no data was copied into >>> >>>> the buffer, leaving the original (now junk) contents. I probed the >>> >>>> I2C bus with an oscilloscope, and I verified that the transfer did indeed >>> occur. >>> >>>> The timing between submission and completion seems reasonable for >>> >>>> the bus speed (50 kHz for whatever reason). >>> >>>> >>> >>>> I had a look over the I2C driver, and nothing looked obviously >>> >>>> incorrect. If anyone has ideas on what to try, I'm more than willing. >>> >>> >>> >>> Is the DMA controller cache-coherent? I see the mainline LS1046A DT >>> doesn't have a "dma-coherent" property for it, but the behaviour is entirely >>> consistent with that being wrong - dma_map_single() cleans the cache, >>> coherent DMA write hits the still-present cache lines, dma_unmap_single() >>> invalidates the cache, and boom, the data is gone and you read back the >>> previous content of the buffer that was cleaned out to DRAM beforehand. >>> >> >>> >> I've tried both with and without [1] applied. I also tried removing >>> >> the call to dma_unmap_single, but to no effect. >>> > >>> > Actually, I wasn't updating my device tree like I thought... >>> > >>> > Turns out I2C works only *without* this patch. >>> > >>> > So maybe the eDMA is not coherent? >>> >>> It seems like this might be the case. From the reference manual: >>> >>> > All transactions from eDMA are tagged as snoop configuration if the >>> > SCFG_SNPCNFGCR[eDMASNP] bit is set. Refer Snoop Configuration >>> Register >>> > (SCFG_SNPCNFGCR) for details. >>> >>> But there is no such bit in this register on the LS1046A. On the LS1043A, this >>> bit does exist, but on the LS1046A it is reserved. I read the register, and >>> found the bit was 0. Perhaps eDMA was intended to be coherent, but there >>> was a hardware bug? >> >> Thanks for the findings. I don't know the reason why this bit is reserved on LS1046a either. It should have a similar design as LS1043a. > > Funnily enough, this bit is not set for the LS1043A either [1]. So maybe > this is a U-Boot bug? I'll test this tomorrow. OK, this looks like it fixes things. I'll submit a patch to U-Boot. But this bit should really be documented in the LS1046A manual as well. --Sean > [1] https://source.denx.de/u-boot/u-boot/-/blob/master/arch/arm/cpu/armv8/fsl-layerscape/soc.c#L680 > >>> >>> If this is the case, then I think dma-coherent should be left out of the top- >>> level /soc node. Instead, the qdma, sata, usb, and emmc nodes should have >>> dma-coherent added. >>> >>> Li/Laurentiu, what are your thoughts? >> >> Then looks like it is not correct to say all devices on the bus is coherent. But as we have the new "dma-noncoherent" property now and most of the devices are actually coherent, we probably can keep the bus as dma-coherent and mark exceptions with dma-noncoherent? > > Neat, I didn't know about that. > > Yes, that sounds good. For the moment, only i2c0 uses DMA, so we will > only need it there. At some point, someone should send a patch enabling > it for the rest of the I2C devices, as well as the LPUARTs and SPIs.
