Hi! The subject is the wrong, you are only fixing one comment and you are only fixing one driver so you could just as well mention that driver explicitly in the prefix with "i2c: viperboard: ...". 2022-09-08 at 15:21, wangjianli wrote: > Delete the redundant word 'to'. > > Signed-off-by: wangjianli <wangjianli@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-viperboard.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-viperboard.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-viperboard.c > index 8b5322c3bce0..8f87394abbcf 100644 > --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-viperboard.c > +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-viperboard.c > @@ -318,7 +318,7 @@ static int vprbrd_i2c_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *i2c, struct i2c_msg *msgs, > amsg->addr = pmsg->addr; > amsg->unknown1 = 0x00; > amsg->len = cpu_to_le16(pmsg->len); > - /* send the addr, the data goes to to board */ > + /* send the addr, the data goes to board */ I'd change it to "goes to the board" instead. Cheers, Peter > ret = vprbrd_i2c_addr(vb->usb_dev, amsg); > if (ret < 0) > error = ret;
