From: Luca Ceresoli <luca.ceresoli@xxxxxxxxxxx> "intension" should have probably been "intention", however "intent" seems even better. Reported-by: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@xxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Luca Ceresoli <luca.ceresoli@xxxxxxxxxxx> --- Changed in v2: - this patch is new in v2 --- Documentation/i2c/i2c-topology.rst | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/Documentation/i2c/i2c-topology.rst b/Documentation/i2c/i2c-topology.rst index 6f2da7f386fd..65ed76bc979f 100644 --- a/Documentation/i2c/i2c-topology.rst +++ b/Documentation/i2c/i2c-topology.rst @@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ When using a mux-locked mux, be aware of the following restrictions: I.e. the select-transfer-deselect transaction targeting e.g. device address 0x42 behind mux-one may be interleaved with a similar operation targeting device address 0x42 behind mux-two. The - intension with such a topology would in this hypothetical example + intent with such a topology would in this hypothetical example be that mux-one and mux-two should not be selected simultaneously, but mux-locked muxes do not guarantee that in all topologies. -- 2.34.1
