From: Luca Ceresoli <luca.ceresoli@xxxxxxxxxxx> "Etc" here was never meant to be a heading, it became one while converting to ReST. It would be easy to just convert it to plain text, but rather remove it and add an introductory text before the list that conveys the same meaning but with a better reading flow. Fixes: ccf988b66d69 ("docs: i2c: convert to ReST and add to driver-api bookset") Signed-off-by: Luca Ceresoli <luca.ceresoli@xxxxxxxxxxx> --- Changed in v2: none --- Documentation/i2c/i2c-topology.rst | 5 ++--- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/Documentation/i2c/i2c-topology.rst b/Documentation/i2c/i2c-topology.rst index 7cb53819778e..1b11535c8946 100644 --- a/Documentation/i2c/i2c-topology.rst +++ b/Documentation/i2c/i2c-topology.rst @@ -5,6 +5,8 @@ I2C muxes and complex topologies There are a couple of reasons for building more complex I2C topologies than a straight-forward I2C bus with one adapter and one or more devices. +Some example use cases are: + 1. A mux may be needed on the bus to prevent address collisions. 2. The bus may be accessible from some external bus master, and arbitration @@ -14,9 +16,6 @@ than a straight-forward I2C bus with one adapter and one or more devices. from the I2C bus, at least most of the time, and sits behind a gate that has to be operated before the device can be accessed. -Etc -=== - These constructs are represented as I2C adapter trees by Linux, where each adapter has a parent adapter (except the root adapter) and zero or more child adapters. The root adapter is the actual adapter that issues -- 2.34.1