Re: [PULL REQUEST] i2c-for-5.20-part2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PULL REQUEST] i2c-for-5.20-part2
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2022 22:34:42 +0200
In-reply-to: <YvidybasUAuhGPMB@shikoro>
Mail-followup-to: Wolfram Sang <wsa@xxxxxxxxxx>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@xxxxxxxx>, linux-i2c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, cocci@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
References: <YvfGY2qnl2YXrUgX@shikoro> <CAHk-=wjGmhaE-Y8GqWKPtWYOi=bOarFgo7UkzHNoOVEKnkXXrQ@mail.gmail.com> <YvhC5Orb+JeZFDEO@shikoro> <YvhXzarjOLEJ8nsW@shikoro> <YvidybasUAuhGPMB@shikoro>

> Pushed again with patches for userspace programs in 'tools/' and
> 'arch/um/os-Linux' removed. That was too late yesterday to notice them.

Got a 'success' message now from the buildbot for the above branch.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

References:
- [PULL REQUEST] i2c-for-5.20-part2
  - From: Wolfram Sang
- Re: [PULL REQUEST] i2c-for-5.20-part2
  - From: Linus Torvalds
- Re: [PULL REQUEST] i2c-for-5.20-part2
  - From: Wolfram Sang
- Re: [PULL REQUEST] i2c-for-5.20-part2
  - From: Wolfram Sang
- Re: [PULL REQUEST] i2c-for-5.20-part2
  - From: Wolfram Sang

Prev by Date: Re: [PULL REQUEST] i2c-for-5.20-part2
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] i2c: algo: bit: allow getsda to be NULL
Previous by thread: Re: [PULL REQUEST] i2c-for-5.20-part2
Next by thread: Re: [PULL REQUEST] i2c-for-5.20-part2
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux GPIO] [Linux SPI] [Linux Hardward Monitoring] [LM Sensors] [Linux USB Devel] [Linux Media] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite News] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI]

Powered by Linux