On Tue, Jul 19, 2022 at 5:21 PM kernel test robot <rong.a.chen@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Hi Jason, > > I love your patch! Yet something to improve: > > [auto build test ERROR on wsa/i2c/for-next] > [also build test ERROR on linus/master v5.19-rc7 next-20220718] > [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. > And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in > https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] > > url: > https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Jason-Gerecke/i2c-Use-u8-type-in-i2c-transfer-calls/20220718-233658 > base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/wsa/linux.git > i2c/for-next > config: hexagon-randconfig-r026-20220718 > (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20220719/202207190634.ToyhlXSz-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/config) > compiler: clang version 15.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project > d74b88c69dc2644bd0dc5d64e2d7413a0d4040e5) > reproduce (this is a W=1 build): > wget > https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross > -O ~/bin/make.cross > chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross > # > https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commit/9732240c23a365c0590f05ce83196869235a2ea7 > git remote add linux-review https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux > git fetch --no-tags linux-review > Jason-Gerecke/i2c-Use-u8-type-in-i2c-transfer-calls/20220718-233658 > git checkout 9732240c23a365c0590f05ce83196869235a2ea7 > # save the config file > mkdir build_dir && cp config build_dir/.config > COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross W=1 > O=build_dir ARCH=hexagon SHELL=/bin/bash drivers/iio/adc/ > > If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag where applicable > Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx> > > All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): > > >> drivers/iio/adc/max1363.c:1645:12: error: incompatible function pointer types assigning to 'int (*)(const struct i2c_client *, const char *, int)' from 'int (const struct i2c_client *, const u8 *, int)' (aka 'int (const struct i2c_client *, const unsigned char *, int)') [-Werror,-Wincompatible-function-pointer-types] > st->send = i2c_master_send; > ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > >> drivers/iio/adc/max1363.c:1646:12: error: incompatible function pointer types assigning to 'int (*)(const struct i2c_client *, char *, int)' from 'int (const struct i2c_client *, u8 *, int)' (aka 'int (const struct i2c_client *, unsigned char *, int)') [-Werror,-Wincompatible-function-pointer-types] > st->recv = i2c_master_recv; > ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > 2 errors generated. Wolfram and Jonathan, Writing a patch to fix the new warnings generated by my I2C patch is simple enough, but I'd like some help coordinating getting both patches landed. Should I wait for the I2C patch to land in "for-next" before sending the IIO fix, or would it be preferred to send the IIO fix right now so that both patches can be reviewed simultaneously?
