Hi, On Wed, Jul 06, 2022 at 09:55:27PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 06/07/2022 21:34, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > On Sun, Jun 26, 2022 at 10:22:09PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > >> On 23/06/2022 18:31, Sebastian Reichel wrote: > >>> Just like RK356x, RK3588 is compatible to the existing rk3399 binding. > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >>> --- > >>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-rk3x.yaml | 1 + > >>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > >> > >> That's still some old tree you are based on... > > > > What do you mean by that? > > The patch was sent to not updated email, so I assume it was based on > something before v5.18. Could be relevant, could be not, but it raises a > question what was a base this (and other Rockchip) series. :) The last round of rk3588 patches (incl. this one) are based on v5.19-rc1, but mail destinations are not (I do not generate the mail destinations fully automatic). -- Sebastian
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
