Hi UWe, > Assuming you agree to this quest, it would be great if you accepted the > change (+ the then maybe still non-accepted driver changes) in the i2c > tree exposing them early after 5.20-rc1 in next. Maybe it will be > sensible to then create a signed tag for these changes to allow other > affected maintainers to pull this change into their trees. Yes, I can do this. Your proposal makes sense to me. Thank you for your work! Wolfram
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
