O > This series is a subset of the one that was first submitted as a larger > series to add swnode support [1]. In this one, it will be focused on > fwnode support only since it seems to have reach a consensus that > adding fwnode to subsystems makes sense. From a high level view, I like this series. Though, it will need Peter's ack on the I2C mux patches as he is the I2C mux maintainer. Still, I wonder about the way to upstream the series. Feels like the first 5 patches should not go via I2C but seperately?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
