On Thu, 12 May 2022, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 11:00:38AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote: > > On Wed, 11 May 2022, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > On Wed, May 11, 2022 at 6:08 PM Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On 5/10/22 17:14, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > ... > > > > > I must admit I have lost track of all the Ack-s / Reviewed-by-s a bit. > > > > > > > > So from the above I take it that the Ack-s resp. Reviewed-by-s on the > > > > other non drivers/platform/x86 bits also signal an Ack to merge the entire > > > > series through the pdx86 tree? > > > > > > > > Lee, any chance you can take a look at patches 3-5 and give your Ack > > > > for merging these through the pdx86 tree together with the rest? > > > > > > Actually I misinterpreted Lee's different tags again. Acked-by is > > > normal for routing MFD code via other subsystems, while > > > Acked-for-MFD-by is for Lee (scripts?) to route the code via MFD tree. > > > Lee, is it the correct interpretation now? > > > > Yes, that is correct. > > Thanks for clarification. I'm learning hard way :-) > > > I just replied to your 0th patch (before I saw this, sorry). > > Thanks for the tag. > > So, it seems we all set to route this via MFD then. Do you think we can go? > Or do need to postpone this to be after v5.19-rc1? I think Hans is correct. I would like to see this soak before submitting directly to Mainline. -- Lee Jones [李琼斯] Principal Technical Lead - Developer Services Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
