Re: [PATCH] i2c: at91: use dma safe buffers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am 04.03.22 um 09:43 schrieb Wolfram Sang:
I'm getting quite a bunch of unrelated mails because the regex is not the
best.
I can imagine!

On the other hand the framework is used in a lot of drivers and I do want to
be notified when they mess with their interfaces.
Sure thing. I am convinced the regex can be improved to ensure that to a
high degree. I think it is also less work for you than asking people to
rename their variable all the time :)

Well not all the time. It's just that you absolutely hit the nail on the head with the name.

The local variable for the DMA-buf handle is just nearly always named dma_buf or dmabuf in the drivers.

Christian.


Going to take a another look at that when I have time.
Thank you!





[Index of Archives]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Hardward Monitoring]     [LM Sensors]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Media]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux