On Wed, Mar 02, 2022 at 10:17:20PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>
> > Attempting to rollback the activation of the current master when
> > the current master has not been activated is bad. priv->cur_chan
>
> But the master is activated?
>
> 259 /* switch to first parent as active master */
> 260 i2c_demux_activate_master(priv, 0);
>
> Or am I missing something? :)
But _this_ code is affected by the problem you describe, or?
237 if (!adap_np) {
238 dev_err(&pdev->dev, "can't get phandle for parent %d\n", i);
239 err = -ENOENT;
240 goto err_rollback;
241 }
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
