Le Wed, 23 Feb 2022 17:05:22 +0200,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit :
> > const void *device_get_match_data(struct device *dev)
> > {
> > if (!fwnode_has_op(fwnode, device_get_match_data)
> > return fwnode_get_match_data(dev);
> > return fwnode_call_ptr_op(dev_fwnode(dev),device_get_match_data, dev);
> > }
> >
> > But I thought it was more convenient to do it by setting the
> > .device_get_match_data field of software_node operations.
>
> Should this function be called e.g. software_node_get_match_data() instead,
> as it seems to be specific to software nodes?
Hi Sakari,
You are right, since the only user of this function currently is the
software_node operations, then I should rename it and move it to
swnode.c maybe.
--
Clément Léger,
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineer at Bootlin
https://bootlin.com
