> > Reusing is nice, of course, but I hope you noticed that I needed to > > revert this feature: > > > > a19f75de73c2 ("Revert "i2c: core: support bus regulator controlling in adapter"") > > yes, I've seen it, and as far as I understand it's expected to get it > back after the regression fixes. True, but work on this has stalled, sadly. I am gathering interested parties for the topic here :) > Wolfram, can you please share your opinion on device tree binding name and > placement for an SDA/SDC pull-up controlled by a regulator? For efficiency reasons, not before bus regulator has been applied again because the above question depends on it IIUC. Until then, I'll work on other items of my too long todo list.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature