Re: [PATCH] Revert "i2c: core: support bus regulator controlling in adapter"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 6:58 PM Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> hi Konstantin and Tareque,
>
> Can you help provide logs if we apply
> 5a7b95fb993ec399c8a685552aa6a8fc995c40bd but revert
> 8d35a2596164c1c9d34d4656fd42b445cd1e247f?
>
Another thing might be helpful to test with:

after apply 5a7b95fb993ec399c8a685552aa6a8fc995c40bd
1. delete SET_LATE_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(i2c_suspend_late,
i2c_resume_early) and function i2c_suspend_late() and
i2c_resume_early().
2. delete SET_RUNTIME_PM_OPS(i2c_runtime_suspend, i2c_runtime_resume,
NULL) and function i2c_runtime_suspend() and i2c_runtime_resume().

Does it still fail if we do 1 or 2?

Sorry that we don't have a platform with intel CPU and amd GPU
combination to test with.


> Thanks
>
> On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 6:02 PM Tareque Md Hanif
> <tarequemd.hanif@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 1/12/22 15:51, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > > would the reporters of the
> > > regression be available for further testing?
> > Sure. I am available.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Hardward Monitoring]     [LM Sensors]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Media]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux