On Wed, Jan 05, 2022 at 02:53:04PM +1300, Chris Packham wrote: > When performing an I2C transfer where the last message was a write KASAN > would complain: > > BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in mpc_i2c_do_action+0x154/0x630 > Read of size 2 at addr c814e310 by task swapper/2/0 > > CPU: 2 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/2 Tainted: G B 5.16.0-rc8 #1 > Call Trace: > [e5ee9d50] [c08418e8] dump_stack_lvl+0x4c/0x6c (unreliable) > [e5ee9d70] [c02f8a14] print_address_description.constprop.13+0x64/0x3b0 > [e5ee9da0] [c02f9030] kasan_report+0x1f0/0x204 > [e5ee9de0] [c0c76ee4] mpc_i2c_do_action+0x154/0x630 > [e5ee9e30] [c0c782c4] mpc_i2c_isr+0x164/0x240 > [e5ee9e60] [c00f3a04] __handle_irq_event_percpu+0xf4/0x3b0 > [e5ee9ec0] [c00f3d40] handle_irq_event_percpu+0x80/0x110 > [e5ee9f40] [c00f3e48] handle_irq_event+0x78/0xd0 > [e5ee9f60] [c00fcfec] handle_fasteoi_irq+0x19c/0x370 > [e5ee9fa0] [c00f1d84] generic_handle_irq+0x54/0x80 > [e5ee9fc0] [c0006b54] __do_irq+0x64/0x200 > [e5ee9ff0] [c0007958] __do_IRQ+0xe8/0x1c0 > [c812dd50] [e3eaab20] 0xe3eaab20 > [c812dd90] [c0007a4c] do_IRQ+0x1c/0x30 > [c812dda0] [c0000c04] ExternalInput+0x144/0x160 > --- interrupt: 500 at arch_cpu_idle+0x34/0x60 > NIP: c000b684 LR: c000b684 CTR: c0019688 > REGS: c812ddb0 TRAP: 0500 Tainted: G B (5.16.0-rc8) > MSR: 00029002 <CE,EE,ME> CR: 22000488 XER: 20000000 > > GPR00: c10ef7fc c812de90 c80ff200 c2394718 00000001 00000001 c10e3f90 00000003 > GPR08: 00000000 c0019688 c2394718 fc7d625b 22000484 00000000 21e17000 c208228c > GPR16: e3e99284 00000000 ffffffff c2390000 c001bac0 c2082288 c812df60 c001ba60 > GPR24: c23949c0 00000018 00080000 00000004 c80ff200 00000002 c2348ee4 c2394718 > NIP [c000b684] arch_cpu_idle+0x34/0x60 > LR [c000b684] arch_cpu_idle+0x34/0x60 > --- interrupt: 500 > [c812de90] [c10e3f90] rcu_eqs_enter.isra.60+0xc0/0x110 (unreliable) > [c812deb0] [c10ef7fc] default_idle_call+0xbc/0x230 > [c812dee0] [c00af0e8] do_idle+0x1c8/0x200 > [c812df10] [c00af3c0] cpu_startup_entry+0x20/0x30 > [c812df20] [c001e010] start_secondary+0x5d0/0xba0 > [c812dff0] [c00028a0] __secondary_start+0x90/0xdc > > This happened because we would overrun the i2c->msgs array on the final > interrupt for the I2C STOP. This didn't happen if the last message was a > read because there is no interrupt in that case. Ensure that we only > access the current message if we are not processing a I2C STOP > condition. > > Fixes: 1538d82f4647 ("i2c: mpc: Interrupt driven transfer") > Reported-by: Maxime Bizon <mbizon@xxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Chris Packham <chris.packham@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Applied to for-current, thanks!
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature