+Serge On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 10:45:56AM +0100, Jan Dabros wrote: > This patchset comprises support for new i2c-designware controller setup on some > AMD Cezanne SoCs, where x86 is sharing i2c bus with PSP. PSP uses the same > controller and acts as an i2c arbitrator there (x86 is leasing bus from it). > > First commit aims to improve generic i2c-designware code by adding extra locking > on probe() and disable() paths. I would like to ask someone with access to > boards which use Intel BayTrail(CONFIG_I2C_DESIGNWARE_BAYTRAIL) to verify > behavior of my changes on such setup. > > Second commit adds support for new PSP semaphore arbitration mechanism. > Implementation is similar to the one from i2c-designware-baytrail.c however > there are two main differences: > 1) Add new ACPI ID in order to protect against silent binding of the old driver > to the setup with PSP semaphore. Extra flag ARBITRATION_SEMAPHORE added to this > new _HID allows to recognize setup with PSP. > 2) Beside acquire_lock() and release_lock() methods we are also applying quirks > to the lock_bus() and unlock_bus() global adapter methods. With this in place > all i2c clients drivers may lock i2c bus for a desired number of i2c > transactions (e.g. write-wait-read) without being aware of that such bus is > shared with another entity. > > Mark this patchset as RFC, since waiting for new ACPI ID value. As a temporary > measure use "AMDI9999". Once proper one will be ready, will re-send this CL for > review & merge. > > Looking forward to some feedback. If I am not mistaken something similar happened in Baikal T1. Perhaps Serge has something to share. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko