On Sun, Nov 07, 2021 at 10:57:00PM +0100, Heiner Kallweit wrote: > If an invalid block size is provided, reject it instead of silently > changing it to a supported value. Especially critical I see the case of > a write transfer with block length 0. In this case we have no guarantee > that the byte we would write is valid. When silently reducing a read to > 32 bytes then we don't return an error and the caller may falsely > assume that we returned the full requested data. > > If this change should break any (broken) caller, then I think we should > fix the caller. > > Signed-off-by: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@xxxxxxxxx> Applied to for-next, thanks!
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
