On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 07:46:42AM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 11/12/21 8:43 AM, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > On 11/12/21 8:26 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > On Fri, Nov 12, 2021 at 6:01 PM Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On 11/12/21 4:34 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > > > > ... > > > > > > > > + * @rinfo: I²C GPIO recovery information > > > > > > > > Preferably: "I2C" > > > > > > Why? > > > > See below vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv: > > > > like it is in thousands of places in the kernel source tree. > > > > > > > UTF-8 has been established for more than a decade. I prefer to use the > > > proper form of the abbreviation (*). > > > > > > *) Check UM10204.pdf. > > > > > Yes, I am aware of what is in the spec. > > > > Wolfram, what do you prefer? > > > I prefer I2C. But it is more a reading habit. I would neither enforce > > I2C nor I²C. > > OK, let's leave it as Andy sent it then. > > Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunla@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Thanks! Wolfram, can it be applied now or should I resend? -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
