Re: [PATCH v4 12/12] dt-bindings: serial: fsl-lpuart: Add i.MX8DXL compatible

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 21-11-18 19:04:04, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 07:46:55PM +0200, Abel Vesa wrote:
> > Add i.MX8DXL lpuart compatible to the bindings documentation.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@xxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/fsl-lpuart.yaml | 4 ++++
> >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/fsl-lpuart.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/fsl-lpuart.yaml
> > index dc1f0e07cbd4..fa8a602ccb22 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/fsl-lpuart.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/fsl-lpuart.yaml
> > @@ -27,6 +27,10 @@ properties:
> >        - items:
> >            - const: fsl,imx8qm-lpuart
> >            - const: fsl,imx8qxp-lpuart
> > +      - items:
> > +          - const: fsl,imx8dxl-lpuart
> > +          - const: fsl,imx8qxp-lpuart
> > +          - const: fsl,imx7ulp-lpuart
> 
> I'm confused why 8dxl is compatible with 7ulp, but 8qm is not? From the 
> driver, it looks like the difference is clocks.
> 

There are still things to be upstreamed for the fsl-lpuart driver.
Looking at the NXP's tree, 7ulp has some specific fixup that the
8qm doesn't need.

Have a look here:

https://source.codeaurora.org/external/imx/linux-imx/tree/drivers/tty/serial/fsl_lpuart.c?h=lf-5.10.y#n3242

> >  
> >    reg:
> >      maxItems: 1
> > -- 
> > 2.31.1
> > 
> >



[Index of Archives]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Hardward Monitoring]     [LM Sensors]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Media]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux